Mental Health Association of Portland

Oregon's independent and impartial mental health advocate

Steve Duin: In chopping the Crisis Assessment Treatment Center, Portland swings a mean ax

Posted by Jenny on 9th May 2013

By Steve Duin, The Oregonian, May 6, 2013

catc_map_62111In chopping CATC — the Crisis Assessment Treatment Center — off at the knees, Mayor Charlie Hales is only looking to finish what the Portland police started.

What remains to be seen is whether the cops’ stubbornness about the mental health facility is driving (a) the city’s budget priorities, and (b) a quick wedge between the mayor and Multnomah County Chair Jeff Cogen.

The timing of Hales’ announcement to eliminate $634,000 in CATC funding couldn’t have been worse, breaking even as the city announced a $2.3 million settlement for a deplorable cop shooting that left William Kyle Monroe, who suffers with bipolar disorder, permanently disabled.

But the mayor’s move also added to the perception — shared by the U.S. Department of Justice and many local mental-health advocates — that the police bureau considers its dealing with the mentally ill a colossal inconvenience.

After Cogen and former Mayor Sam Adams opened CATC with great ceremony in 2011, the cops acted as if the triage center didn’t exist.

Capt. Sara Westbrook, head of the behavioral health unit, dismissed the center as unworkable for police last spring, and remained wedded to her objections on its admission guidelines long after CATC revised them.

As The Oregonian’s Maxine Bernstein reported over the weekend, many patrol officers never knew CATC was an option. Never mind that almost 200 of the 1,300 people treated there were first dropped off by police at local emergency rooms.

“This wasn’t designed to make the cops’ lives easier,” Cogen reminds us. “This was designed for people having a mental health crisis. The real focus is that these 1,300 people have a place to go so they don’t run into the cops.”

Small wonder if Cogen feels betrayed. He partnered with Adams on CATC funding when partnering with Adams wasn’t easy. Briefed on potential budget cuts by Hales, he asked for one lone reprieve.

“I said to him very clearly, ‘The one I really hope you don’t cut is CATC,’” Cogen said.

The preliminary proposal was submitted for Hales’ consideration by Commissioners Nick Fish and Steve Novick.

Fish is holding fast to his original diagnosis.

“We were charged with being provocative,” he said Sunday. “This is a healthy debate, and long overdue. And the more I look into this, the more I hear that there have been a lot of misgivings about CATC.”

Novick has a different take. Given the city’s financial stake in the center, he says, “It puzzles me that Sam never followed up to see if the cops were using it.”

Even more striking, he says, were the contradictory narratives that city commissioners heard from the police and county leaders garnered from their people about the facility.  “From the very beginning,” Novick says, “there have been two conflicting messages.”

Westbrook continued to argue CATC wouldn’t accept people who were a threat to themselves or others long after the center was beaming up a different message with the bat signal.

As Kevin McChesney at Telecare, which operates the center for the county, told Bernstein, its doors are open to anyone short of “the person swinging an ax.”

If there’s a lesson here about police bureau mulishness, there’s another one about leadership and attention to detail.

“Normally, the efficient and right thing for a political leader to do is listen to your staff people and trust what they’re telling you,” Novick said.

“But you have two organizations here — mental health and the police — who don’t naturally speak the same language. They got locked into these positions over the last year and a half.”

Which proves? “There are situations where political leaders need to dig into the weeds and say, ‘What’s going on here?’ Read the documents. See if there isn’t a misunderstanding instead of blindly following what their people are telling them.”

Novick met with Cogen on Monday. Off what he heard, he said, “There’s a stronger argument that the city should fund a portion of the CATC than I thought there was based on the information I had last week.”

Is that cause for Portland cops to join the conversation? Time will tell. Historians are skeptical.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

City Council okays land-line tax to fund police reforms, but next year’s Council will decide how it’s spent

Posted by admin2 on 29th November 2012

By Maxine Bernstein, The Oregonian, Nov. 28, 2012

Portland City Council members (L-R) Randy Leonard, Amanda Fritz, Mayor Sam Adams, Dan Saltzman, Nick Fish.

Portland City Council members (L-R) Randy Leonard, Amanda Fritz, Mayor Sam Adams, Dan Saltzman, Nick Fish.

Portland’s City Council Wednesday unanimously voted to extend a tax to all land-line phone service providers – an idea that Mayor Sam Adams pushed to raise millions of dollars a year for federally-mandated police reforms.

The vote came amid protest from representatives of Century Link and Frontier, two of the companies that would be affected. The Taxpayer Association of Oregon also conducted a phone campaign in recent days, opposing the tax.

The phone company officials warned that the tax would increase rates for their customers, and is not equitable because it fails to tax wireless phone service providers.

But the mayor and commissioners said the additional tax is appropriate.

“In terms of being fair to everybody receiving the same services, this is a first step towards tax parity,” said Commissioner Amanda Fritz.

Fritz pointed out that how the new revenue is spent will be up to next year’s City Council.

CenturyLink and Frontier, which have been in Portland longer than other land-line services, are taxed 7 percent of the revenue they earn from basic phone service.

Comcast and Integra, which entered the market more recently, pay 5 percent of their gross revenues to the city, which includes revenue from other land-line phone services such as call waiting, voice mail or caller ID.

Under the plan approved, CenturyLink and Frontier would start paying the city 5 percent of their gross revenues, starting Jan. 1.

The new taxes are expected to generate between $3 to $5 million a year.

The mayor has argued that his plan would bring CenturyLink and Frontier in line with the other big land-line providers.

“This is an incremental step towards equity,” Adams said Wednesday. He urged the council in the coming year to address taxing wireless phone providers, and said he’d testify in support of such a plan as a citizen.

Adams said the additional revenue will help the city pay for the estimated $5.4 million annual cost to adopt police reforms, under the city’s agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice.

Commissioner Dan Saltzman said he was not convinced the $5 million amount “is really what’s needed.”

Yet he supported the phone tax, with some reservations. He said he recognizes there’s still disparity because wireless phone providers are not included.

“I find this issue to be a vexing one, and it does disproportionally affect seniors,” Saltzman said.

But he said phone land lines “continue to be a bargain.”

“This tax is going to be a modest tax, probably an additional $12 a year,” for customers, Saltzman said. He further promoted the usefulness of land-line phones, saying they’re more trustworthy during emergencies when the power goes out.

The city estimated that customers who get their land-line phone service from CenturyLink or Frontier, for example, could see their monthly bills rise by $3.84 to $9.24 a year because of the new utility tax.

Earlier this month, the council unanimously approved a negotiated settlement with federal officials that calls for reforms to police policies, training and oversight. The agreement came after the Justice Department found police engaged in a pattern of excessive force against people with mental illness.

Commissioner Nick Fish said he was disturbed to have received a robocall at his home Tuesday night, from the taxpayers’ association opposing the tax.  He said he was going to follow up with his phone provider to see if his customer information was given to the advocacy group without his consent.

Fish said he supported the tax. He signaled that he hoped the future council will consider taking up the issue of wireless phone service.

Commissioner Randy Leonard called the tax “a small incremental increase to pay for important services.”

“We have a revenue issue in this city that this alone will not fix” Leonard said, “but it helps a little.”

Jason Williams, executive director of the Taxpayers Association of Oregon, said he was disappointed by the council vote.

“We’re concerned Portland just raised a multi-million dollar tax on seniors to pay for their legal bailout -for something that has nothing to do with phone service.”

Williams said the increased rates to customers will unfairly impact seniors who rely on land-line phones.

Speaking of the City Council members, Williams said, “To them it’s free money, but to seniors and low-income people it’s not.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Police union president slaps back at Mayor’s decision

Posted by admin2 on 25th September 2012

PPA Press Release on Employment Relations Boards Decisions

By Daryl Turner, PPAVigil.org, September 25, 2012

PPA President Daryl Turner

Integrity is essential to the believability of information produced during an investigation. The Employment Relations Board ruling in the Officer [Ronald] Frashour case asserts that during their investigation they have reviewed and researched all the information provided to them by both parties. After a thorough investigation that spanned over several months and thousands of pages documents the ERB has ruled that the City of Portland is in violation of ORS243.672(1)(g). Further the ERB has ordered the City to “cease and desist from violating ORS 243.672(1)(g)“ and to reinstate Ronald Frashour as a Portland Police Officer within 30 days.

The ERB is the sixth independent body that has ruled that Officer Ron Frashour committed no misconduct, violation of laws, civil rights violations, or violations of training and policies of the Portland Police Bureau. Yet Mayor [Sam] Adams snubs his nose at all of them including the U.S. Department of Justice, whom he praised so highly just last week for their findings in regards to their investigation into the patterns of the use of force by the Portland Police Bureau.

Mayor Sam Adams

Mayor Adams has turned this into a personal vendetta using the hard earned dollars of taxpaying Portlanders as his personal check book to extend this politically motivated witch hunt at the expense of the integrity of a process that protects the very core of collective bargaining.

Throughout this process Mayor Adams has desperately tried to tip the scales of this ill-fated investigation in order to justify his actions and statements made before the evidence and the facts of the Aaron Campbell incident had been presented before a grand jury. We knew how Mayor Adams felt when he marched through the streets of Portland rather than waiting to gather facts. Six independent bodies have reviewed the facts. All six have exonerated Officer Frashour of any misconduct. Mayor Adams stands alone, unsupported by facts. It’s time for him to end this mess, and provide the community with closure.


WATCH – Press Conference with Daryl Turner


Press Conference Statement Regarding Reinstatement of Officer Ron Frashour

By Daryl Turner, PPA Rap Sheet, September 24, 2012

Today, in a unanimous opinion, the Oregon Employment Relations Board (ERB) determined that the City violated State law by refusing to put Officer Ron Frashour back to work. The ERB is the sixth independent body to clear Officer Frashour of misconduct. A Multnomah County Grand Jury; the Oregon Employment Department; the United States Department of Justice; Oregon’s Department of Public Safety Standards and Training; a nationally recognized arbitrator hand-selected by the City; and now the ERB have all said the same thing—Officer Frashour acted reasonably and lawfully.

The ERB’s order is compelling given that its three members—one from a management-side labor law background, one neutral, and one from a union background—unanimously agreed that State collective bargaining law requires the City to honor the final and binding arbitration award that ordered Officer Frashour back to work. The ERB’s reasoning is clear:  Officer Frashour engaged in no misconduct and his reinstatement would not violate public policy.

From the beginning, the Portland Police Association has supported Officer Frashour because he followed the training and policies of the Portland Police Bureau on the night of January 29, 2010. The unnecessary battle that the City undertook should now be over. The City has spent over $750,000 of taxpayer funds to keep Officer Frashour fired. That sum is unacceptable in a time where local governments are struggling to provide core services to their communities. That sum is also shocking given that, in the words of the ERB, the City’s actions were “calculated” and in clear disregard of well-established State law.

Now is the time to move forward and provide closure to this incident. For nearly three years, Officer Frashour, Mr. [Aaron] Campbell’s family, and the community have endured the politicizing of a tragedy. No good has come of it. The City asserted that transparency, accountability, and integrity of the process compelled it to seek review of the arbitration award; the ERB has now affirmed that the arbitration award satisfied each of those concepts. The time has come for the City to honor its legal obligations and return Officer Frashour to work.


Police union blasts Portland Mayor Sam Adams over stance on Frashour reinstatement

Aaron Campbell

The president of the Portland police union blasted Mayor Sam Adams Tuesday morning, saying Adams’ defiance of an order to reinstate officer Ron Frashour reflects “a personal vendetta.”"He’s showing the questionable integrity that he’s had all during his tenure,” said Portland Police Association President Daryl Turner. “We’re obviously upset about it but more than upset, we’re disillusioned with the fact that he’s our police commissioner.

Turner said Adams should heed the findings of the employment relations board which yesterday ordered the city to follow an arbitrator’s ruling and to reinstate Frashour within 30 days, with back pay, benefits and 9 percent interest.

Frashour was fired after he fatally shot an unarmed man in January 2010. Frashour has said he believed the man, Aaron Campbell, was reaching for a gun.

Turner said the employment relations board’s decision follows independent reviews that concluded Frashour’s actions were justified and followed proper police procedures and training.

“Mayor Adams has turned this into a personal vendetta and is using the hard-earned dollars of tax-paying Portlanders as his personal checkbook to extend this politically motivated witch hunt at the expense of the integrity of a process that protects the very core of collective bargaining,” Turner said. “Mayor Adams stands alone unsupported by the facts and it’s time for him to end this mess and provide the community with closure,” Turner said.

The union president said he plans to speak with the other city commissioners to urge them to vote against an appeal of the ruling, adding that Frashour is ready to return to work.


UPDATED: State Board Orders Mayor Adams to Reinstate Ron Frashour

By Denis C. Theriault, Portland Mercury, September 24, 2012

Mayor Sam Adams
The Oregon Employment Relations Board, in a perfunctory ruling reached on Friday, has told the city of Portland and Mayor Sam Adams to reinstate Ron Frashour, the officer fired for fatally shooting Aaron Campbell in the back in 2010. The board decided that putting Frashour back to work, with back pay, wouldn’t amount to a “public policy violation,” something the city tried to argue using an obscure state collective bargaining law.

The board’s decision—the latest turn in a case that generated enormous community outrage and helped lead to a damning federal report on how Portland cops treat the mentally ill—may mark the end of a monthslong effort by Adams to do anything in his power to keep Frashour from working as Portland cop. Adams has a press conference planned at 3 to respond. To keep fighting, via a court challenge, he’ll now need two other city commissioners to join him.

Frashour was fired later in fall 2010 for the Campbell shooting and for a history of other questionable judgment calls involving the use of force. But an arbitrator this spring ruled Frashour’s decision to shoot the distraught and suicidal Campbell—tragically ending a welfare check gone chaotically awry amid a breakdown in police communication and a dubious use of a beanbag gun—was reasonable because Frashour said he believed Campbell was reaching for a gun. When Adams balked at reinstating Frashour, the Portland Police Association filed an unfair labor practices complaint with the ERB.

UPDATE 3:25 PM: Adams, at a short press conference where shared the lectern with City Attorney James Van Dyke, said he expected the ERB’s decision and promised he would hold a public hearing in the next 30 days (before Frashour would return to work) and ask his fellow commissioners to back sending the matter to the Oregon Court of Appeals.

“That’s what were fighting for here: our ability to manage our own police bureau on behalf of Portlanders who have their own set of values and have the right to have a police force that reflects that,” said a clearly emotional Adams, lamenting that “labor unions and their connected institutions” have a greater say on discipline and values than “the city council, the police commissioner, the police chief.”

“It is frustrating to have so much of what should be our local control taken away from us with these arcane or misused state labor laws,” he also said.

Update 5:05 PM: I’ve just finished buzzing the four city commissioner offices, and it’s looking like the mayor will have his work cut out for him convincing his colleagues that a court challenge makes sense.

I’ve previously reported that Randy Leonard disagreed with the initial decision to send Frashour’s reinstatement to the ERB. Leonard, who worked on the law the mayor is citing when he served in Salem, says he doesn’t know “that you can convince the Court of Appeals that first an arbitrator and then the ERB disregarded collective bargaining laws.” He’ll never be convinced “it’s a good idea,” but if it’s a close decision for him—he worries an adverse court might “embolden bad behavior”—he’ll support the mayor.

“He’s the police commissioner,” said Leonard, a close Adams ally and a former union leader himself.

Nick Fish maybe comes closest to distilling what’s in play for the rest of the council. He says he wants a full briefing from the city attorney’s office and that he needs to see the city has a “plausible legal strategy” for a challenge and that “we’re not just kicking the can down the road” if the courts say no.

Dan Saltzman said he hadn’t read the ruling yet and didn’t have any comment, other than to say he wasn’t surprised. Amanda Fritz was out of the office; I’ve sent her a message asking for comment.  Later she said couldn’t comment because she hadn’t read the ruling.

Original post resumes here:The panel looked closely at the arbitrator’s ruling clearing Frashour, seizing on a key distinction raised the Portland Police Association: Not only was Frashour punished too severely, the arbritrator found, but more importantly there also wasn’t any misconduct to punish.”There is no need for any further analysis by this Board once the arbitrator determines that the greivant did not engage in misconduct,” the ruling said. “The arbitration award must be implemented.”

The decision wasn’t unexpected. As the Mercury first reported this spring, legal observers who helped write the law Portland tried to use to keep Frashour from the police force were convinced the city was on shaky ground.

UPDATE CONTINUED: A Portland court challenge challenge would follow other—losing—court fights that came after ERB reinstated other public employees. Van Dyke explained that the city wants to challenge ERB’s basic approach to this kind of case—complaining that it shouldn’t stop at the question of whether an arbitrator did or didn’t misconduct because arbitrators sometimes get that finding wrong. As an example, the city cited its attempt nearly 20 years ago to punish Officer Douglas Erickson in a deadly force case, a case held up as one of the reasons a “public policy” exemption was added to collective bargaining laws.

Adams said he’s been keeping his fellow commissioners apprised of the case but didn’t way whether he had any commitments. The PPA’s president, Daryl Turner, has also been making the rounds, as I reported in Hall Monitor earlier this year.

“I want them to have the time over the next couple of weeks to sit down on their own with our outside counsel and the city attorney and learn all the details on the matter and make a decision,” Adams said. “I don’t speak on their behalf.”

Adams also took the chance to hit back at the PPA for telling a “very selective and distorted story about the investigation into the use of force by officer Frashour,” referring to leaked transcripts from the arbitration hearing that forced the city attorney’s office to write a stern letter to the PPA’s attorney. Turner, in describing the confidential transcripts in the PPA’s newsletter this summer, argued they revealed Frashour’s firing was politically motivated. The city has bristled at that but declined to release, citing the ongoing legal fight, the full set of transcripts to rebut that. Instead the city has promised a review by the auditor’s office.

“We’ve used restraint,” Adams said.

Adams also batted away complaints over the cost of the legal fight to keep Frashour off the police force: approaching, if not already surpassing, $1 million. He defended it as an “investment” in our values.

“It is totally worth it, and Portlanders expect us to do this.”

Meanwhile, over the PPA’s newsletter, Turner has posted a statement of his own.

Today, in a unanimous opinion, the Oregon Employment Relations Board (ERB) determined that the City violated State law by refusing to put Officer Ron Frashour back to work. The ERB is the sixth independent body to clear Officer Frashour of misconduct. A Multnomah County Grand Jury; the Oregon Employment Department; the United States Department of Justice; Oregon’s Department of Public Safety Standards and Training; a nationally recognized arbitrator hand-selected by the City; and now the ERB have all said the same thing—Officer Frashour acted reasonably and lawfully.

The ERB’s order is compelling given that its three members—one from a management-side labor law background, one neutral, and one from a union background—unanimously agreed that State collective bargaining law requires the City to honor the final and binding arbitration award that ordered Officer Frashour back to work. The ERB’s reasoning is clear: Officer Frashour engaged in no misconduct and his reinstatement would not violate public policy.

From the beginning, the Portland Police Association has supported Officer Frashour because he followed the training and policies of the Portland Police Bureau on the night of January 29, 2010. The unnecessary battle that the City undertook should now be over. The City has spent over $750,000 of taxpayer funds to keep Officer Frashour fired. That sum is unacceptable in a time where local governments are struggling to provide core services to their communities. That sum is also shocking given that, in the words of the ERB, the City’s actions were “calculated” and in clear disregard of well-established State law.

Now is the time to move forward and provide closure to this incident. For nearly three years, Officer Frashour, Mr. Campbell’s family, and the community have endured the politicizing of a tragedy. No good has come of it. The City asserted that transparency, accountability, and integrity of the process compelled it to seek review of the arbitration award; the ERB has now affirmed that the arbitration award satisfied each of those concepts. The time has come for the City to honor its legal obligations and return Officer Frashour to work.


Police union president slams Adams over Frashour fight

KATU.com, September 25, 2012

The president of the Portland Police Association accused Portland Mayor Sam Adams of using the controversy over reinstating Officer Ron Frashour for political gain.

“Mayor Adams has turned this into a personal vendetta,” Portland Police Association President Daryl Turner said at a news conference Tuesday morning. “And he’s using the hard-earned dollars of taxpaying Portlanders as his personal checkbook to extend this politically motivated witch hunt at the expense of the integrity of a process that protects the very core of collective bargaining.”

Last Friday, the Oregon Employment Relations Board ruled that the city must adhere to an arbitrator’s decision and re-hire Ron Frashour. Adams has stated in the past he would fight efforts to have Frashour reinstated.

Frashour shot and killed Aaron Campbell during an encounter outside Campbell’s apartment in 2010. Campbell was unarmed. After an investigation, Frashour was fired for his actions during the shooting.

Turner said the mayor had “snubbed his nose” at the demand from the ERB to reinstate Frashour and claimed Adams is using the controversy for political purposes. He said the mayor’s pursuit of Frashour has already cost the city $1 million.

“This is personal for the mayor, he wants to make a statement,” Turner said.

Turner also said several reviews of the incident by agencies not related to the union found no misconduct in Frashour’s actions and it was time for the mayor to accept the call to reinstate Frashour.

“This is a person who did his job,” Turner said of Frashour. “He did what he was trained to do. He did what he had sworn to do, and he trusted the integrity of a process, and the integrity of the police commissioner to be able to agree with that process, which they did.”

“And now that the process has gone through all of the stages the mayor now is—uh, I can’t use that word—the mayor is backing out of it,” Turner said. “He’s showing the questionable integrity that he’s had all during his tenure. He’s showing that he’s not up to living up to the promises he’s made to the Police Bureau, to the Police Association. And we’re obviously upset about it, but more than that we’re also disillusioned with the fact that he’s our police commissioner.”

“Mayor Adams stands alone, unsupported by facts. It’s time for him to end this mess and provide the community with closure,” Turner said.

He also said he hopes Portland city commissioners do not take the case to the Oregon Court of Appeals. But Tuesday afternoon, City Commissioner Randy Leonard issued a press release saying he would support Adams in an appeals process.

The Portland Police Association also released a statement to the media about the controversy, reiterating many of the points made Turner.

 


Police Union Says Adams Has Vendetta Against Frashour

By Andrea Damewood, Willamette Week, September 25, 2012

Mayor Sam Adams‘ determination to to keep fired Portland Police Officer Ronald Frashour off the force is “to justify his tenure as police commissioner,” Portland Police Association President Daryl Turner said Tuesday morning in a press conference.

“[Adams] has turned this into his personal vendetta,” Turner said. He said the mayor is conducting a “politically motivated witch hunt” and “using taxpayer money as his personal checkbook.”

Turner’s remarks came the day after the the state Employee Relations Board gave Adams 30 days to re-hire Frashour, who shot and killed unarmed 25-year-old Aaron Campbell in the back in 2010.

Adams promised Monday afternoon that if he could gain the support of a majority of city commissioners, he’d challenge the ERB runing in the Oregon Court of Appeals.

Turner said he’ll be attempting to meet with city commissioners himself to lobby them against siding with Adams.

Further appeals are a waste of taxpayer money, said Turner, who said that the city’s spent “probably over $1 million” to fight Frashour’s rehiring. The union boss said the ERB’s findings back up those of five other independent bodies who cleared Frashour of either criminal or police policy and training wrongdoings.

According to the Portland City Attorney’s office, however, the total amount of money spent by the city in all the Frashour appeals has been $620,000. The city spent $60,000 on the complaint with the ERB, and attorney costs from the date of the initial complaint to the state arbitrator, to the arbitrator’s ruling was about $560,000, Adams’ spokeswoman Caryn Brooks told WW in an email.

“We have a police commissioner and a mayor who is not going to listen to any one else,” Turner said.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Shot on the Street
What the Shooting of Two Homeless Men Ought to Mean for Portland’s Camping Ban

Posted by admin2 on 5th March 2012

By Denis C. Theriault, Portland Mercury, March 01, 2012

It was about 9pm on a blustery, rain-soaked Tuesday night — and, yet, thanks to a horde of Mardi Gras revelers, Old Town was unusually festive.

Precisely what happened next isn’t exactly clear, but the basic inflections of the story, told by a handful of different people, all agree on one point: A group of homeless men had been turned away from their usual overnight spot at Right 2 Dream Too (R2D2) — the camp-like refuge on NW 4th and Burnside — because the small lot, dotted by a few dozen tents, had already been filled by others with nowhere to go.

Shelter space, like it is every winter night, was also tight, and so the men had to make do. They could have crashed on the sidewalk across from R2D2, waiting amid drunken noise and dampness, until a tent maybe opened up in the wee hours. Instead, they split up. One man went in one direction, and the other two went another: east, across the Willamette River and down into the grim-but-dry industrial underbelly of the Morrison Bridge.

Sometime before 5am on Wednesday, February 22, they were sleeping, covered, when a dark-colored station wagon pulled down SE Belmont. Someone inside leaned out with a gun and opened fire, and then the car vanished as quickly as it arrived. Carter Hickman, 57, took a bullet to the chest, while Albert Dean, 43, was merely grazed — and soon both men were on the way to OHSU.

As crimes go, this was particularly horrifying. And the questions, and the fears, remain fresh: Did the men do something to bring this upon themselves? Or was this one of those rare, random, senseless incidents?

But none of that really matters. Because this was something else: a wakeup call. On the streets, violence and vulnerability are inextricably linked — it’s just that we never really hear much about it. According to Multnomah County’s 2011 one-day homeless street count, nearly half of unsheltered people reported enduring some kind of violence that might otherwise have been avoided behind walls or if they were just somewhere safe.

And that wakeup call comes at a portentous time for Portland. Twin protests over the city’s ban on tent camping — one of them around the clock — remain outside city hall, confronting staffers and politicians with the issue daily. On February 29, after at least one false start, the city is scheduled to present a tepid plan to settle a years-long federal lawsuit over that same camping ban. And March 1 will mark the second month of steep fines for R2D2′s landlord — continuing a code enforcement crackdown on the well-managed safe haven for the homeless that, its backers say, the city really ought to be embracing instead.

Like Chasing Ghosts

Until the night they were shot, Hickman and Dean — better known by some as “Joe” and “Allen,” respectively — had been staying off and on at R2D2 for about five weeks. They had a regular tent near the rest area’s entrance, specially chosen because of their work schedule.

“We’d always put them in the same spot” in C7, said Joe Green, R2D2′s top security man, a couple of days after the shooting. “They always had to get up early to go to work.”

That’s the point of Right 2 Dream Too. It’s built so people who need a night’s sleep, or several, or a place to dry out, can sack out in peace and store their belongings — and then maybe get their bearings enough to find and keep a job and begin the slog back up to self-sufficiency.

Most nights, if its residents can’t make it back early enough, there’s a long line of people hoping to check in by 7 pm. The site holds up to 80 people, and on any given day, two or three dozen of them are new faces.

Joe and Allen and their friend became quiet fixtures at the site, Green and others say. When they weren’t working, they would help keep things tidy and even helped reengineer some tents. They would take meals at Sisters of the Road or at nearby churches.

“There were always the three of them,” Green says. “We would call them our workers.”

Later, an Occupy Portland member wrote that he remembered seeing the men in camp last fall.

But learning more about Joe and Allen was, in some ways, like chasing ghosts. On Friday, February 24, police said, both were still in OHSU, with Hickman expected to live. But an OHSU switchboard operator said there was no record Hickman had ever been at the hospital and said Dean, despite what police said, had been released from the emergency room after the shooting.

Neither man has a serious criminal record in Multnomah County. Court records, in fact, show just a single TriMet exclusion for each, issued on separate days in August 2011. The files list the same cell phone number (it’s not working) and a common address, the Portland Rescue Mission, at 111 W Burnside.

It was only after I made my way to the end of the dozens-strong line of Rescue Mission visitors that someone’s ears perked up. “I know them,” said a stricken-looking younger man, who gave his name as John. “They came from Seattle.”

On his way inside the mission, John offered a heartbreaking detail: He said the men weren’t just friends, but partners who were living “as husband and husband.”

“They’re my best friends,” he finished, before disappearing inside.

“Am I Scared? I Don’t Know”

It’s still unclear, publicly at least, why Joe and Allen were shot. Police, despite offering a $1,000 reward for tips (503-823-4357), are sharing precious little about what detectives have uncovered, including during their interviews with the two men.

Rhetoric at city hall and among social services providers immediately homed in on the possibility that the attack was random — a sociopathic strike against two people who did nothing more than bunk up on a sidewalk under a bridge. That fear was felt on the streets.

Less than 24 hours later, a block east of the shooting, a man named Tim was propped up in a lawn chair keeping watch on three blanket-swaddled companions, one of them a pregnant woman. It was a gritty vigil, with trains lurching past a few blocks away, cars rumbling overhead, and rats skittering for food scraps.

“Am I scared?” he said. “I don’t know. I don’t know if I can get any sleep. Being out here like this, I don’t want someone to roll up and go pow-pow-pow-pow.”

Since then, reactions have grown more measured. But the emphasis on vulnerability remains.

“In terms of this specific incident, we don’t have a good idea yet of what was happening there. But we do know that people sleeping on the streets take a variety of different risks,” says Marc Jolin of JOIN, an agency that works to link homeless Portlanders with services and housing. “Violence, theft, assault. That is not uncommon. We get reports from folks of the violence they experience at the hands of partners on the street, and verbal and physical assaults… from strangers.”

The 2011 street count found more than 1,700 people sleeping outside, and a few thousand more in emergency shelters. The Portland Police Bureau does not directly track how many reports each year involve someone who’s considered homeless. Nor does the bureau track cases in which violence seems to be motivated solely because a victim is homeless. Multnomah County, alongside Street Roots, is currently trying to put a number on how many homeless Portlanders die on the streets — of natural causes and otherwise.

The National Coalition for the Homeless, however, has tracked a modest increase in hate-crime-like attacks against Oregon’s homeless in recent years. Overall, from 1999 to 2009, it counted 37 attacks, 10 of them fatal.

But some attacks never lead to a report. Not that they don’t hurt. The same night Joe and Allen were turned away from R2D2 — Fat Tuesday — drunks walking by couldn’t resist pounding on the site’s walls or shouting insults, says one of the men keeping watch that night, Dale Ardway.

Inside the Machine

The plight of Right 2 Dream Too — founded in October 2011 by the same organizers behind Dignity Village out by the airport — has added new electricity to the fight against Portland’s camping ban.

And because it sits on private land, hosted by a landlord who’s partially trying to jab a finger in the city’s eye, R2D2 has had time to show off its success. Cops in the area appreciate the eyes on the street. Neighbors, looking past the fact that the site sits under the Chinatown Gate, appreciate the quiet respect R2D2′s residents have for the area.

The place runs like a machine, with security patrols around downtown, governing meetings, ample storehouses of tools, blankets, and food, and strict rules against intoxication and violence. It’s given hope and offered a model for how to cheaply, if still imperfectly, help people in need at a time when government coffers are starving just as much. R2D2 takes couples and pets and undocumented immigrants, and asks few questions — something the shelters in town don’t always do.

And yet the city has declared the place an unpermitted recreational campground — and is bombarding its landlord with massive fines that could drive it out of existence. Getting a permit, and adding facilities like a sewer line to get legal, are too expensive for volunteers who rely on donations to pay for steady bills like laundry, electricity, and porta-potty service.

“We provide walls. We provide security, and they want to charge us money for something they should be doing,” says Ibrahim Mubarak, an R2D2 spokesman and founder.

Mubarak says close to 600 people passed through the site from February 1-15, and that security has to kindly refuse, on some nights, up to 20 people. Nearly a dozen inhabitants have found more permanent housing, he says, and dozens more have used the respite to find work.

They’re raising money, dreaming of a bigger lot downtown, close to social services—and pleading with city hall.

“If they close us down, where are these people going to go?” asks Mubarak. “What sidewalk can they sleep on?”

A Chill From City Hall

Reaction from Portland City Hall has so far been frigid. Commissioner Dan Saltzman, who runs the city bureau in charge of code enforcement, has steadfastly refused to waive any fines. In fact, his office says, they’re considering whether to ask a city hearings officer for permission to dramatically increase the $641 monthly fine in coming months.

At one point there was hope among organizers that Commissioner Amanda Fritz might broker a compromise — she showed up at a march in support of the site — but that talk has since fizzled.

Portland’s housing commissioner, Nick Fish, also has been quiet about the site. In the aftermath of the shooting, he issued a statement lashing out at the attack, but it was criticized by some advocates for not being more vocally supportive of R2D2.

“The city is making progress in its effort to end homelessness,” he wrote. “The opening of Bud Clark Commons is but one notable example. This shameful criminal act reminds us that everyone in our community deserves a safe and decent place to call home.”

The Commons, which wouldn’t be here without Fish, has been a godsend — for some. It has a day center that’s helped thousands since June 2011, but its shelter has room for only 90 men at a time, and its 130 apartments for the chronically homeless are already full (and they also allow substance abuse). Then there’s the cost: $47 million, making it hardly replicable.

If Fish is sympathetic to R2D2′s model, he’s keeping his cards very close. After protesters filled his office earlier this month, he agreed to sit down with Saltzman and talk about R2D2 — nothing more.

In his favor, last December Fish did push the council (over the clamor of the Portland Business Alliance) into backing a car-camping pilot program that could, one day, be stretched to include a site like R2D2. Under his plan, churches and nonprofits would be able to host as many as four cars, with a written agreement from Saltzman’s office directing code enforcers to turn a blind eye.

A dozen or so churches have expressed interest, and the Portland Housing Bureau is expected to release specific guidelines as soon as this week.

But when asked about R2D2 the day after Joe and Allen’s shooting — after the Mercury first reported the men had stayed there — Fish walked very carefully.

Instead, he said the shooting of Joe and Allen was a chance to rally against looming city budget cuts that might threaten millions in cash for things like short-term rent assistance, more social services, and more brick-and-mortar housing.

“I want to know what the options are at this site first,” he says. “You know there’s not support on this council for the wholesale relaxation of the camping ordinance, even though as practical matter we don’t always enforce it.”

The fluid nature of the city’s camping ban — a term of art some of its lawyers disagree with — is glaringly obvious down under the Morrison and Hawthorne Bridges, where some people prop up tarps and other structures that offer more cover than mere bedrolls.

It’s up to officers, right now, to decide when to enforce city rules against tents and sidewalk sleeping. One officer’s wishes on one night may not be the same as another cop’s on another night. Just like violence, that murkiness is another fact of life for Portlanders on the streets.

And whatever settlement emerges from court may not make that any clearer.

A previous attempt at an agreement would have allowed small tent clusters. The latest version, last time the city discussed it on the record, was expected to include only changes in training and enforcement, but not any exemptions.

“There’s no ban in town. It’s happening. It’s tolerated,” says David Woboril, a deputy city attorney who handles police issues and isn’t working on the settlement. “But the city has to manage it.”

Woboril and Fish both said the city worries that large camps won’t always be as well run as R2D2 — and will cost the city resources to keep the peace.

“Large camps have a victim problem,” Woboril says. “That’s always the question: Can you do it on a large scale?”

The folks at R2D2 say they, at least, have earned the right to keep trying. Mubarak says activists from California and cities across Oregon have come around to take notes. Cities don’t have to spend big, he says, or surrender the rule of law to let homeless residents help themselves.

Joe Green, R2D2′s main security volunteer, was thinking about all the other homeless Portlanders who could’ve wound up like Joe and Allen.

“Without us,” he said, “there’d be a whole lot more lives at stake.”

The Mercury’s Sarah Mirk contributed to this report.
Photos by Daniel Cronin


‘Like’ this Posting on Facebook

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Two Homeless Men Shot While Sleeping Under Morrison Bridge

Posted by admin2 on 22nd February 2012

By Maxine Bernstein, The Oregonian, Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Four homeless people sit below the Morrison Bridge Wednesday afternoon, on the south sidewalk of Southeast Belmont Street, between Third Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. They said they were disturbed by the early morning drive-by shooting that targeted two homeless men sleeping two blocks away. They said they usually look out for one another, but one man added, "When someone's driving by, there's not much you can do about it.''

Thomas Boyd / The Oregonian
Four homeless people sit below the Morrison Bridge Wednesday afternoon, on the south sidewalk of Southeast Belmont Street, between Third Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. They said they were disturbed by the early morning drive-by shooting that targeted two homeless men sleeping two blocks away. They said they usually look out for one another, but one man added, "When someone's driving by, there's not much you can do about it.''

An employee of the 24-hour Senvoy courier company heard two shots followed by screams early Wednesday and called 9-1-1, bringing Portland police to Southeast Belmont Street below the Morrison Bridge, where two homeless men were shot while they lay sleeping.

One man was struck in the chest and the other grazed by a bullet in a pre-dawn drive-by shooting that police suspect was random. It sent fear through other homeless people living on the city’s streets and stunned homeless advocates, city officials and even police.

“It’s straight-up ridiculous,” said William Creed, 36. “It’s way too close to home.”

Home for Creed is a slab of sidewalk below the Hawthorne Bridge, three blocks away, where he spent the night and often finds shelter from the rain.

“It’s got me scared. I really don’t need this now,” said Karen Creed, 49, who has been living on the streets on and off since 2007 and camps with William below the Hawthorne Bridge to stay dry. “I hope it’s not a gang initiation thing or some psycho out there trying to kill homeless people.”

Central Precinct officers responded to the 5:12 a.m. call. One of the victims was in his late 50s; the other in his early 40s. Police found the two men bedded down on the south sidewalk of Southeast Belmont Street, between First and Second Avenues, east of the railroad tracks. The two were taken to a local hospital. The man shot in the chest was in critical condition but expected to survive.

Flat sheets of cardboard remained on the sidewalk later, marking the dry spot where the homeless men slept. Forensic criminalists searched for evidence and took photos.

Karen Creed said investigators talked to them this morning and warned them to be aware.

Karen Creed said investigators talked to them this morning and warned them to be aware.

“An individual fired two rounds striking two men who were asleep,” said Lt. Robert King, Portland police spokesman. “They’re in their bedrolls and they’re literally sleeping. It really is awful and shocking.”

Police described a suspect vehicle as a four-door, black, newer model pickup without a canopy.

Police, city officials and homeless advocates expressed outrage.

“That is beyond anything I have heard happening in Portland before,” said Marc Jolin, executive director of JOIN, a nonprofit that works with the homeless. “It’s unbelievable that someone would do something like this.

City Commissioner Nick Fish, who oversees housing in the city, said homeless people are particularly vulnerable to violence. A city count on Jan. 26, 2011, found 1,718 people sleeping outside, in a vehicle or an abandoned building in Portland.

“I condemn the perpetrator of this ugly act of violence,” Fish said. “This shameful act reminds us that everyone in our community deserves a safe and decent place to call home.”

Map of shooting site

Celia Soltero, an employee of the Senvoy courier company, said she usually saw the two homeless men around 7:30 each morning on her way into the company’s warehouse, which backs up to Southeast Belmont Street. One was usually still asleep, while the other often was packing his blankets, sleeping bag, tarp and belongings into a shopping cart, Soltero said. She noticed they had slept in the same spot for about two months.

“They minded their own business,” Soltero said. She said she would usually nod hello or wave and say “Hi.”

“It’s horrible. It’s definitely eye-opening,” Soltero said of the shooting. “It never seemed very dangerous here. I guess I should be more careful.”

Later Wednesday, officers questioned homeless people who were sleeping beneath the Hawthorne Bridge. The Creeds said two officers came by their camp Wednesday morning asking whether they had heard anything and they also took names of everyone sleeping outside. Police cautioned them to be alert and watch out for each other, Karen Creed said.

The shooting marked the second in three days in inner Southeast Portland. Sunday a bouncer was fatally shot in front of a nightclub on Southeast Morrison Street. No arrests have been made.

Later Wednesday, four homeless men remained camped below the Morrison Bridge, closer to Southeast Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. Workers in the industrial neighborhood said they commonly see homeless people seeking shelter beneath the bridge and under loading docks’ awnings.

“You got to be crazy to start shooting someone sleeping,” said Ed Wilson, who works for Airefco Inc., which backs up to Belmont Street.

Thurston Holmes, who works for City Liquidators, watched as police photographed the crime scene and took measurements below the Morrison Bridge.

“It’s the only shelter in the area from the rain,” he said. “That’s sad.”

Oregonian Staff Writer Noelle Crombie contributed to this story.

Read: Portland Mercury: Drive-By Shooting Injures Two Homeless Men Sleeping Under Morrison Bridge
Read: Portland Mercury: Homeless Men Shot Under Morrison Bridge Had Been Turned Away from Packed Old Town Tent Refuge
Read and Watch: KATU TV: Two homeless men shot in ‘drive-by’ under Morrison Bridge
Read and Watch: KPTV TV: Homeless men shot while sleeping under Morrison Bridge
Read: Rev. Chuck Currie: Statement On Ash Wednesday Shootings Of Homeless Portlanders


‘Like’ this Posting on Facebook

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Stakes rise in the Aaron Campbell suit

Posted by admin2 on 10th January 2012

by Steve Duin of The Oregonian, January 9, 2012

As the City of Portland prepares to sue its former insurance company for $1.5 million in unrecovered legal costs, that carrier — Chartis Inc. — has become increasingly vigilant over another wrongful death suit that might ding the Seattle company again.

Aaron Campbell - Dad

Aaron Campbell - Dad

The city insists that Chartis should reimburse Portland for legal defense costs in nine cases, including the contentious James Chasse suit, which eventually led to a $1.6 million settlement for Chasse’s family. Chartis reportedly coughed up $800,000 of that settlement.

Most of the legal fees in dispute are the hourly billings by the city’s own attorneys. Several lawyers I spoke with contend that the city’s argument is a stretch.

City Attorney Linda Meng‘s response? “I don’t believe we have had a case before in which we have reached the self-insured retention and sought recovery for our defense costs based on our in-house attorneys.

“It is not appropriate for me to lay out our legal argument on the merits here. The claim we are making comes from an interpretation of the entire policy.”

Chartis only belatedly was involved in the protracted settlement negotiations between the city and the Chasse family, but the insurer has been all over the pending federal civil rights lawsuit against the city in the January 2010 death of Aaron Campbell.

Officer Ronald Frashour fatally shot Campbell as Campbell walked backward out of a Northeast Portland apartment with his hands locked behind his head. The Portland Police Bureau fired Frashour nine months later for that use of deadly force.

From the beginning of depositions in the Campbell family’s federal suit, Chartis lawyers — from the Seattle firm of Stafford Frey Cooper — have had seats at the table.

Other attorneys involved in the suit said this level of involvement by insurance lawyers is unusual.

Michael Lehner — who represented Sgt. Liani Reyna before she was dropped from the list of defendants — said he has been involved in six similar cases with the city the past 15 years: “It’s the first time I’ve seen it.

“They (Chartis) probably surmised this would reach into their level of coverage,” Lehner added.

Or well beyond the city attorneys’ level of expertise.

“The insurance company is on the hook,” said attorney William Blair, whose client, Sgt. John Birkinbine, was also dropped from the case. “If I’m the insurance company in a case like Campbell, I’d want to be involved so I could decide when to step in and take over the defense.”

It’s hard to generate sympathy for Chartis here. As Commissioner Nick Fish notes, “Insurance companies make money by reading their policies very narrowly.” Consumers are required to buy their product, and state regulators work overtime to guarantee their profits.

But the timing of the city’s decision to sue Chartis for $1.5 million is curious, coming, as it does, one month before the Campbell trial is set to begin.

By firing Frashour and disciplining Officer Ryan Lewton — who hit Campbell with six beanbag rounds — the city has conceded that the Campbell shooting violated the police bureau’s directives on deadly force.

Are we arguing, then, over a true accounting of responsibility in the death of Aaron Campbell … or simply over how the city and Chartis will split the check?

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Putting our arms around homelessness

Posted by admin2 on 22nd November 2011

From The Oregonian Editorial Board, November 21, 2011

NOTE: This editorial, like Portland’s Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness, misses an essential point: the cause of most chronic homelessness is untreated or mistreated addiction or mental illness. Until engaging and worthwhile mental and addiction health services are available on demand, ‘ending’ homelessness is unlikely.

The Occupy Portland encampment may be fading in the rearview mirror, but the five-week “occupation” did showcase one thing: homelessness.

Alcoholics, mentally ill people, drug addicts, street kids and others — some well known to police and social service agencies — were drawn to the camp in three downtown parks.

If you weren’t paying close attention, you might have imagined that the camp was a fairly benign place. Well, think again. It sure wasn’t safe for the runaways who congregated there. Tents obscured what was going on, and some tents that were clearly labeled (“safe injection” and “sexual assault response”) testified to the dangers.

“There are young people with significant developmental delays, mental illness and drug/alcohol abuse issues mingling with potentially predatory adults (and young children) in a largely unchecked environment,” Dennis Morrow, executive director of Janus Youth Programs, warned Mayor Sam Adams at one point. No rules combined with no transparency? Morrow called that “a recipe for disaster.”

In the aftermath of police dismantling Occupy, one sentiment we haven’t heard is: Wow, that was great. Let’s try this again soon. Even the core protesters complained of being swamped by myriad problems. Still, the camp raised an important question: What should this community do to help people with no place to go?

For six years, after all, Portland and Multnomah County have been working on an aggressive 10-year plan to end homelessness. The plan hasn’t solved the problem, but it has forced housing advocates to put their heads together and work smarter.

READ – Home Again – A 10-year plan to end homelessness in Portland and Multnomah County, Citizens Commission on Homelessness – December 2004
READ – 2010 Annual Report for the 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness

One Night Shelter Count, 20042508 (total sheltered individuals – not including people out-of-doors)
One Night Shelter Count, 20112995 (total sheltered individuals), 7382 (total individuals, sheltered and unsheltered)
READ – An Analysis of the Data on Homelessness – May 2004 (data points have shifted slightly over the past six years – homelessness is a VERY hard statistic to pin down.)

Clearly, camping isn’t the answer. Yet even on cold nights, many in Portland are camping. Something close to 2,727 people here are homeless. That’s a snapshot of the problem as of one night last January, when advocates counted 1,718 people sleeping outside, in a car or an abandoned building.

That same night, another 1,009 people were in emergency shelters or in a motel using a voucher. Another 1,928 people would have been homeless, except that they were in transitional housing.

Emergency shelters are nothing less than lifesaving. Yet essential as shelters are, housing advocates in some ways begrudge every dollar spent on the shelter system because it’s a dollar that isn’t available for permanent housing.

In contrast, consider a dollar spent on rental assistance. Or a dollar spent helping someone find a job, so he can pay the rent. Or money spent guiding a disabled widow through red tape so she qualifies for disability or other benefits to which she’s entitled. These dollars can propel the homeless toward a home — and self-sufficiency.

So even though camping is no solution, housing advocates are looking for low-cost ways to put people up, briefly, while housing is secured for them. City Commissioner Nick Fish is looking at allowing homeless people to temporarily camp in their cars on church parking lots, for instance, if a church gives permission.

Some churches are already trying things like this, and others might be willing. Such a proposal does — and should — spark many safety questions. Churches with experience can take the lead in explaining what does and doesn’t work. But new ideas should be welcome. After Occupy Portland, this community should be brainstorming, experimenting and accelerating all of its efforts to move people into housing.

This winter, with the help of the city, the county, nonprofits and churches, Portland has the smarts and creativity to put its arms around this problem in a new way. And, in the process, put its arms around the homeless.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

City looks for money to open more winter shelters

Posted by admin2 on 7th November 2011

From the Portland Tribune, November 7, 2011

Portland housing officials are preparing for cold weather by asking the City Council to increase funding for emergency warming shelters.

On Wednesday the council will consider a request from the Portland Housing Bureau for $367,000 for a number of nonprofit organizations that already provide similar services. The bureau says the money is needed to guarantee shelter and beds for the homeless and those without adequate shelter when temperatures drop below dangerous levels, as they are predicted to do in coming weeks or months.

“There remains a critical annual need for expanded winter shelter and services from November through April to safeguard the lives of vulnerable, unsheltered individuals from inclement weather conditions that pose a threat of severe illness and/or death due to exposure,” reads the ordinance, which was introduced by Housing Commissioner Nick Fish.

The money is in addition to approximately $2.3 million to the organizations already received from the city to help house the homeless. The organizations are the American Red Cross, the Salvation Army and Transition Projects. According to the request, the funds are projected to provide emergency shelter for up to 300 people for a maximum of 15 nights. Shelters include the 70-bed shelter for women operated by Transition Projects.

Under city policies, new emergency warming shelters are to be opened under the following severe weather conditions:

    • Dry conditions – single night temperatures of 22 degrees or below, three or more nights of 25 degrees or below, and temperatures of 32 degrees and below with sustained winds of 15 miles per hour or greater.

    • Wet conditions – snow accumulations of one inch or more, temperatures of 32 degrees or below with driving rain of one inch or more, and temperatures of 32 degrees or below with winds forecast at 15 miles per hour or greater.

City standards for requesting existing shelters and warming centers to provide additional beds when severe weather alerts have not been issued include:

    • Dry conditions – temperatures of 25 degrees or below, or three nights of 27 degrees or below.

    • Wet Conditions – temperatures of 32 degrees or below with sticking snow or rain, temperatures of 33 to 35 degrees with heavy rain (about three-quarters of an inch overnight), or freezing rain.

A number of local meteorologists predicted the upcoming winter would be wetter and colder than usual at the 19th Annual Winter Weather Forecast sponsored by the Oregon chapter of the American Meteorological Society.

All five forecasters who made presentations agreed that La Nina weather conditions are still in force, which is likely to produce severe conditions across the Pacific Northwest. Last winter — when La Nina conditions were also in effect — featured two notable cold spells with low-level snow in late November and late February. It also featured lowland flooding along the Sandy River and record setting snowfall in the mountains.

Some forecasters went even further, however, suggesting that February may be the coldest month of the winter, with the best chances for low-level snow and an arctic outbreak.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »