Mental Health Association of Portland

Oregon's independent and impartial mental health advocate

Suicide by cop: A rights perspective

Posted by admin2 on 2nd September 2011

By Jason Renaud and Jenny Westberg
This article appeared in Oregon Trial Lawyer magazine, Summer 2011

The most discriminated against class of persons – in any place, at any time, within any society – are persons with an active mental illness.

"We fight to stay out of hospitals – not jails, hospitals -- with bars on the windows, guards in the halls, surrounded with razor-wire."  (Image: .:Amy:./Flickr.com)

"We fight to stay out of hospitals – not jails, hospitals -- with bars on the windows, guards in the halls, surrounded with razor-wire." (Image: .:Amy:./Flickr.com)

Race, religion, class – any and all of these biases are there as well, but with an extra push. A person may, for instance, be Hispanic (with a mental illness), or gay and in a wheelchair (with a mental illness). Or a person may be white, middle-class, respectable income bracket, 1.4 kids and dog  – with a mental illness.

Discrimination on the basis of mental illness, then and now, will add to anything and everything that is hated about a person, and it can — does — stand by itself. Persons with a mental illness are discriminated against in employment, education, insurance, housing, in courts of law, and banking. Throughout history we have been excluded, exiled, persecuted, spat upon with impunity.  We are routinely held against our will by law without criminal charge.  We are routinely force-fed dangerous drugs by medical technicians who don’t know our names, much less our medical records, with barely a thought to either “informed” or  “consent.” We fight to stay out of hospitals – not jails, hospitals — with bars on the windows, guards in the halls, surrounded with razor-wire.

And we’re routinely shot — often killed — in encounters with cops, an immovable force of instant death.

Consider Marcus Lagozzino, 34.  In late December of last year, Lagozzino was shot and critically injured in what was termed a “suicide-by-cop.” It was the sixth Portland officer-involved shooting of 2010. Of those six, two of the victims were black. Four were white. All were in crisis from acute mental illness or untreated addiction. Except for Lagozzino, all are now dead.  (Lagozzino was lodged in a locked treatment facility; multiple felony charges await.)

Consider those who go to jail in our city.  The most common class of prisoners, perhaps as many as 90%, are persons who are drunk, loaded, or crazy.  In jail there is little psychiatric treatment, less respect, and shrugged-off brutality — but in some ways, to some of us, it is still better than the hospitals.

And no doubt we cause plenty of problems.  We do crazy things all the time; it’s in our nature. At least, those of us who cannot get access to medical treatment do crazy things — and those of us who continue to try treatment after treatment, to no avail.

For those who find and can pay for treatment, those for whom a treatment works (or those who’ve learned by craft or hard experience to conform), it is still a difficult life – but one that is rarely marked by violence against others. Statistically, individuals with mental illness are more likely to be victims than victimizers.

Yet people with active mental illness and/or addiction make up, by far, the largest part of our crime prevention problem.  So: How do we address this medical, social, experiential, very human problem?

The most expensive, least effective response to mental illness is the law: cops, courts and jails.

The least expensive, most effective response is treatment – an effective bio-psycho-social intervention immediately available for the asking.

We approach through the worst means possible, and the high black irony of this vortex of reason is the euphemism, “suicide-by-cop.” When you hear this term of art, does it not come with a smirk of condescension for both the “suicide” and the officers claiming, by inference, that a psychotic person caused themselves to die with a bullet from the officer’s gun?  Does it not come with a general unease that there, but for some broken-brain chemical accident, go… you?

Recent examples, from the Portland area

Jesse Weatherford, 22, lived in an apartment with his mother Alice.  Neighbors described him as “despondent.”  Late on a June afternoon in 2009, he called his mother, saying, “Mom, I’ve cut myself again. I’ve called police. Mom, I love you. And goodbye.”  He then called Milwaukie police.

Officers encountered Jesse, covered in blood, in the parking lot. When he was unresponsive to their commands, Sgt. Tom Broomfield and Officer Luke Strait fired, striking him twice in the chest. Later, the officers said Jesse had a “big knife.”  Witnesses saw no knife.

The cause of Jesse’s death, ruled Medical Examiner Larry Lewman, was suicide. “His actions precipitated this, both slitting his wrist and the subsequent activity,” said Lewman. Autopsy results showed Jesse Weatherford died from two gunshot wounds to the chest.

Jack Dale Collins, 58, was cutting himself in the bathroom at Hoyt Aboretum on March 22, 2010, when Portland Police Officer Jason Walters responded to reports of a disturbance. Collins emerged from the bathroom holding a pencil-type X-Acto knife. He did not seem to understand Walters’ commands to stop until the third one, when he said, “No, I won’t.”

In a statement, Walters later described Collins as “shuffling” forward, while Walters was backing up; they were about 8-10 feet apart when, as Walters said later, “I felt had no other option.” Less than three minutes after arriving, Officer Walters shot four times, killing Collins.

Eleven days before he was killed, Jackie Collins had walked into Central Precinct, confessing to a crime that officers believed, according to their report, was imaginary. Collins then asked officers if they could help him get psychiatric help. Police advised him to contact a certain agency. No one knows if he tried.

Thomas Higginbotham, 67, was often drunk, including the afternoon of Jan. 2, 2011, when Portland Police Officers Jason Lile and Larry Wingfield responded to the abandoned Lucky Car Wash on 82nd Avenue and Powell, on reports a security guard had been threatened.

Based on grand jury testimony, as reported in The Oregonian, Wingfield and Lile knew they were looking for a man, about 60 years old, wearing a red coat, blue jeans and known to carry a knife. The security guard wanted him arrested for trespassing. The officers were directed to an office where Higginbotham “camped” (with, it seems, some awareness by, or informal agreement with, the building’s owner). The office door was locked.

"We approach through the worst means possible, and the high black irony of this vortex of reason is the euphemism, 'suicide-by-cop.'" (Image: lucasmopdx/Flickr.com)

"We approach through the worst means possible, and the high black irony of this vortex of reason is the euphemism, 'suicide-by-cop.'" (Image: lucasmopdx/Flickr.com)

Wingfield knocked, and said, “Tom, this is Officer Wingfield. Portland police. We just want to talk to you. If you could come out and talk to us, that would be great.” No response. Wingfield asked a bystander, “Hey, this guy got any weapons in there?” He was told yes, he does have weapons – he’s a Vietnam vet. Tom Higginbotham added from behind the closed door, “Oh yeah, I got a weapon all right.”

“That’s when everything changed for me,” Wingfield would later testify.

Wingfield and Lile backed up, and drew their guns. Higginbotham came out of the office with a knife. He did not respond to their commands to drop it.

Officer Wingfield said afterwards in his statement:  ”He steps out and he’s looking at me, and he’s got the eyes of like a shark. He looks mad. He looks angry…I knew he was going to make us shoot him.

“I started getting mad, getting angry that he was going to make us do that.”

Officer Lile used his Taser. Then Wingfield, eight feet away from the man with the knife, fired seven shots. Lile fired five.

Three minutes after officers arrived on the scene, Higginbotham was dead. He was buried with military honors. At time of death, his blood alcohol content was 0.26. The grand jury found there was no criminal wrongdoing by the officers. It was said by many, including The Oregonian, to be a likely example of “suicide by cop.”

Officer Wingfield testified to the grand jury that “he had no options left. ‘The only thing left was shoot him…We didn’t want to shoot him.’”

What is this, “suicide-by-cop”?

The manufactured idea, “suicide-by-cop,” implies several conditions – all false.

1. That violent suicide is a rational, reasonable state of mind. That a suicidal person is determined and unswerving from suicide.  Or, that suicide is an impulsive conclusion to avoid capture.
2. That police officers are entirely unwilling participants, with little or no choice but to comply with suicidal demands.
3. That suicidal people repeatedly trick or connive or stage situations where they cause lethal force to be used against themselves, and because of this fearsome trickery, police officers are not responsible for their lethal actions.

While it’s important to remember the vast majority of police contact comes without violence of any sort, when lethal force is used, most often, in the last many years, in Portland and throughout the U.S. —  it’s directed at someone in crisis.

It seems such a problem of timing. The cops arrive in the midst of a crisis and “have no choice” but to use violence. What if they came an hour earlier? Or a day earlier? What if there was a worthwhile community mental health system which would anticipate crisis and manage it versus stick their heads in the sand? What if that worthwhile community mental health system could come a day or a week or a month prior to the crisis?

For some with an active mental illness, thoughts about suicide are routine, persistent and persuasive.  Many in our community despair and suffer without end. Considering the facts of their lives — or their lives as they seem, that moment — death may be a considered option.

At these moments there are actually very few things on one’s mind – very few things that make sense. “Will this kill me?” If a police officer is involved – likely yes. “Will it be fast? I don’t want to suffer.” In this situation – you probably won’t. “Will I miss the shot, and end up a vegetable?” Not if a cop does it.

And – “Will they do it? Will the cops actually go through with it? — I don’t want them thinking about my safety; I don’t want them hesitating and getting all compassionate. I don’t want this to end at the hospital.” These days, by history, in Portland – you don’t have to worry.

Why can’t someone — cops, or anyone else — come just a little earlier? Jesse Weatherford had, that same day, run his car into a tree, leaving no skid marks. Jack Dale Collins, 11 days prior, walked into a police precinct and asked for mental health treatment.

When a person wants to die, confused and barely thinking at all, should our police officers help them accomplish it? Should they then say, “It was that person’s fault. They were suicidal. I had no choice” ?

Sgt. Anthony McDowell is laid to rest. (Image: OregonLive.com)

Sgt. Anthony McDowell is laid to rest. (Image: OregonLive.com)

Perhaps the most poignant example is what happened — just two months ago at this writing — to Tony McDowell, 50, a decorated veteran for whom grand jury transcripts show full participation, on his part, in a complex and comprehensive treatment process, through the VA, for post-traumatic stress disorder stemming from his service in Iraq. He went to groups, he took medication, he had full understanding of his condition.  And he despaired.  And he suffered.  And he wanted very much to die.

According to those transcripts, Gresham officers Matthew Galbreath and Jason Justus felt sufficiently threatened to oblige, shooting Tony on his front lawn, in front of his wife and 13-year-old daughter.  The lawyers will sort it out. Here is part of what we know:

“Tony McDowell DID NOT ‘confront’ the police with a gun,” the McDowell family statement reads. “He walked out of the house holding a rifle up over his head with both hands. Within seconds, he was shot and killed. He did not even know that police were outside. There were no marked cars, no flashing lights and no sirens.”

Looking at it

More and more, whenever there’s an officer, and a person with mental illness or addiction, and then death of that person in crisis — by police bullet — we hear it called “suicide-by-cop.”

Tear the term apart and note how copwatcher Dan Handelman reframes the language, “No matter what they say, it is a homicide when one person (a cop or anyone else) kills another person using such violent means.”

So what’s the solution?  Perhaps this — a solution with at least five parts.

The first is to help the general community understand that the City’s legal defense of lethal use of force begins in police academy. It is then reinforced by hiring, training, supervision, policy, union contract and legislation.

Second, concede the following: Reform through political channels is ineffective.  Bureaucracy fails us; both elected and appointed leaders remain spellbound by stigma.  Concede also our community finds no justice via grand jury.  The last Portland police officer charged and convicted in a similar situation was Steven Sims, who in 1969 murdered his girlfriend’s husband while in uniform.  The most effective strategy to affect police policy and procedure: Legal action by survivors in civil court.

Third, encourage a public conversation about the qualities of “suicides-by-cop.” Our group, Mental Health Association of Portland, helps by illuminating such cases – including James Chasse, Jr, in 2008, Aaron Campbell in 2009 and Dwayne Ferguson in 2011. Our archive shows over 160 such police shootings and deaths in the Portland area since 1975.

Fourth must be an attempt to understand the experience of persons with mental illness. It is, in part, a nascent civil rights movement, immature and disorganized now. Our timeline may occur over the horizon of our lifespan; our Barack Obama, likely, not yet a twinkle in his grandfather’s eye.

Finally – our state has been pennywise and pound-foolish for decades in providing effective treatment for persons with addiction and mental illness.  The cumulative public and private costs to respond to these urgencies, in Oregon, during FY 2012, could be over a billion dollars.  We probably don’t need to spend more, but we need to be smarter – not filled with fear and retribution.

We need, first, and now, justice. A passing glance. A range of effective treatment options available to any person, as needed and wanted.

These critical, immediate needs, when answered, will be — for us, for you, for every citizen — the beginning.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

Portland’s Police Problem

Posted by admin2 on 10th June 2011

From Mother Jones, June 10, 2011

On September 17, 2006, Portland police officers saw a man behaving abnormally in the city’s trendy Pearl district. The man was James Chasse, a 42-year-old with schizophrenia. Three officers, who thought the Chasse might be a junkie or was urinating on the street, pursued him. Upon catching up with Chasse, the officers Tasered him, kicked him, and one officer slammed him onto the ground, puncturing Chasse’s left lung and fracturing 16 ribs. After a failed attempt to book Chasse in a Portland, Oregon jail, the police decided to take Chasse to the hospital. He died on the way. Four years later, the Portland police admitted that the officers involved should not have gone after Chasse in the first place.

Deaths like Chasse’s have prompted the Department of Justice to investigate the Portland Police Bureau to determine whether or not excessive force has indeed become a “pattern or practice.” The investigation, launched yesterday, will pay specific attention to cases surrounding individuals with mental illnesses. Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division, Thomas E. Perez, said at a press conference in Portland yesterday, “We’re not here to fix the blame, we’re here to fix the problem.” The investigation will first probe the police bureau itself then proceed to interviews with community leaders.

Although Chasse’s death created a visceral response in the local community, there have been many other similar cases. Jack Dale Collins, for example, was a 58-year-old homeless man who was fatally shot four times in March 2010 by Portland police officers after he came out of a restroom covered in blood and holding an Xacto knife.

Then there was Darrel Dwayne Ferguson, a 45-year-old man with HIV, who was killed in December 2010 after being shot several times. Ferguson had allegedly threatened a neighbor with a handgun before the police showed up. He pointed an air pistol at police officers when he answered the police officers’ knocks on the door.

Several of the men shot by Portland police officers had been homeless residents of the city. Portland has been focused on tackling its homeless problem for years. In 2004, the city launched a 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness. According to city officials, Portland has kept 7,000 people off the street by both relocating homeless residents into homes and preventing people from losing their homes. The last documented count of homeless residents found that there were 1,591 on Portland’s streets.

Race is also at the center of the issue. The number of African-American victims has led many in the community to call for justice. The most infamous case came in January of last year, when Aaron Campbell, a 25-year-old African-American man, was shot and killed by Portland police officers. The officers involved claimed they believed that Campbell was reaching for a gun at the time he was shot. Campbell was in fact unarmed. To make matters worse for Campbell’s family, police officers later told his mom that her son had killed himself. The officer who killed Campbell, Ronald Frashour, was fired from the police force but was “cleared of criminal wrongdoing” by a Portland-area judge.

The DOJ’s investigation might be the best opportunity that the city of Portland has to see a change in police practices – and in outcomes for its citizens.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Watchdog requests for cop cameras came before a recent rash of police shootings.

Posted by admin2 on 5th January 2011

From the Willamette Week, January 5, 2011

On Nov. 30, defense attorney Chris O’Connor met with members of the city’s police Citizen Review Committee to push for a simple step he says would increase cops’ accountability and help the public understand why they use force on duty.

He has yet to get a response. And five weeks later, the city is reeling from four officer-involved shootings since mid-December in which two men have died.

The most recent came Jan. 2, when cops in Southeast Portland Tasered and then fatally shot a 60-year-old man who police say refused to drop a knife as officers approached him.

TASER X26 with TaserCam

TASER X26 with TaserCam

O’Connor’s Nov. 30 suggestion to police review officials was to note that Taser sells a $500 camera that mounts onto its stun guns. It automatically records up to 90 minutes of audio and video whenever the gun’s safety is off.


Taser’s website says the cameras increase accountability “not just for officers but for the people they arrest” and have cut complaints against police up to 50 percent in cities where they’re used.

O’Connor, a board member of the Mental Health Association of Portland, urged the Citizens Review Committee’s Taser/Less Lethal Force Work Group to look at buying such cameras as it reviews the Police Bureau’s rules on Tasers.

He says the cameras’ absence here is an ongoing concern for the defense bar.

“In the next year it’s going to be the big issue—why don’t they use an existing technology that would answer all of these questions?” O’Connor says.

Police in West Melbourne, Fla., released Taser footage on YouTube last year to show a cop was justified in stunning a naked jogger. After the recent Portland shootings, such disclosures could serve to calm citizens—assuming the facts of the shootings match how police described them.

Portland cops tested the cameras several years ago but decided not to buy them because of technical issues, such as the fact they film only after the safety is off, says Lt. Kelli Sheffer, a Portland police spokeswoman.“The most critical time to film what’s happening is before the Taser is deployed,” Sheffer says. “We wouldn’t want officers to point a Taser at somebody with the safety off just to film.”

The topic came up in last year’s budget discussions, says Roy Kaufmann, a spokesman for Mayor Sam Adams, who oversees the Police Bureau. “It’s fair to anticipate that the topic will resurface in the coming budget preparation, though it’s too early to speculate on a particular technology or the scope of such a program,” Kaufmann says in an email.

In the other three recent shootings:

* An officer discharged his weapon Jan. 1, police said, while questioning people about the killing of a bouncer earlier that day at Club 915 downtown.

* Officers shot 34-year-old Marcus Lagozzino on Dec. 27 after trying to Taser him. Police say Lagozzino, recovering in a local hospital, was wielding a machete outside his parents’ Southwest Portland home.

* Officers responded Dec. 17 to reports of threats at an east Portland apartment complex and fatally shot 45-year-old Darryel Ferguson. Police say they found a replica handgun at the scene.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

2010 starts with officer-involved shootings, ends with more; 2011 begins the same way

Posted by admin2 on 4th January 2011

By Jenny Westberg, Portland Mental Health Examiner

There were six officer-involved shootings in 2010. (Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pdxjeff/)

There were six officer-involved shootings in 2010. (Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pdxjeff/)

On Dec. 27, Portland police shot Marcus Lagozzino, 34, critically injuring him, in the sixth officer-involved shooting of 2010. Within a week, 2011 started with another officer-involved shooting – then another.

At 1:37 a.m. on Jan. 1, police arrested a man at Club 915 in downtown Portland. While interacting with the crowd, an officer opened fire. His action did not harm anyone – because he missed. (See The Portland Tribune, Jan. 3) Around 4 p.m. the same day, another officer-involved shooting took place. This time it resulted in the death of a 60-year-old man.

In 2010, there were the same number of officer-involved shootings as there were in 2009, 2008 and 2007, combined. Two of the victims were black. Four were white. All were in crisis from acute mental illness or untreated addiction. Except for Lagozzino, all are now dead.

Officer-Involved Shooting Victims, 2010

  • Dec. 27, 2010 – Marcus Lagozzino, 34
  • Dec. 17, 2010 – Darryel Dwayne Ferguson, 45
  • Nov. 23, 2010 – Craig Boehler, 46 (shot by police, but died from smoke inhalation)
  • May 12, 2010 – Keaton Dupree Otis, 25
  • Mar. 22, 2010 – Jack Dale Collins, 58
  • Jan. 29, 1010 – Aaron Marcell Campbell, 25

In Lagozzino’s case, police say they were advised he might be contemplating “suicide-by-cop.” The same thing was said of Campbell.

James Drylie, an ex-police captain who is now executive director of the School of Criminal Justice and Public Administration at Kean University in New Jersey, told The Oregonian that about a third of the 300 police shootings ruled justifiable each year could be characterized as “suicide-by-cop.”

“Bizarre” Term

Jason Renaud, of the Mental Health Association of Portland, objects to the term.

“That the [Portland Police Office of Public Information] uses and promotes the verbiage ‘suicide-by-cop’ is bizarre,” says Renaud. “It implies several conditions – all entirely false:
“1. That violent suicide is a rational, reasonable state of mind. That a suicidal person is determined and unswerving from suicide.
“2. That police officers are unwilling participants.
“3. That police officers have little or no choice but to comply with suicidal demands.
“4. That suicidal people repeatedly trick or connive or stage situations where they cause lethal force to be used against themselves.
“5. That because of fearsome trickery police officers are not responsible for their actions.”

But, says Renaud, “It’s important to remember that the vast majority of police contact comes without violence of any sort.” When it does happen, however, it’s most often someone in crisis because of acute mental illness or active addiction.

According to Renaud, “It seems such a problem of timing. The cops arrive in the midst of a crisis and ‘have no choice’ but to use violence. What if they came an hour earlier? Or a day earlier? What if there was a worthwhile community mental health system which would anticipate crisis and manage it versus stick their heads in the sand? What if that worthwhile community mental health system could come a day or a week or a month prior to the crisis?”

As for “suicide-by-cop,” Dan Handelman of Portland Copwatch says, “No matter what they say, it is a homicide when one person (a cop or anyone else) kills another person using such violent means.”

And as for 2010, it ended sadly – just as it began.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Please note:

This article was updated Jan. 5 to clarify that the first officer-involved shooting of 2011 (at Club 915) did not result in injury or death. There was a death, but it was not a result of an officer’s weapon. Also, the article now includes new information: (1) the officer intentionally fired at someone; (2) he missed.

In the same incident, the date was corrected from Jan. 2 to Jan. 1.

My regrets for any confusion, and thanks to Dan Handelman for pointing it out. — JW
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »