Mental Health Association of Portland

Oregon's independent and impartial mental health advocate

‘Suicide by cop’ means manslaughter

Posted by CoffeeX3 on March 10th, 2012

Brad Lee Morgan smiles at his son, Kannon.

Brad Lee Morgan smiles at his son, Kannon.

By James Mazzocco, on BlueOregon.com

It was January 25, and Brad Morgan wanted to die.

Maybe it was earlier. He had problems. A day, a week, or a month before — nobody can know for sure. All the same, Brad Morgan knew it was time.

A tragic event has the power to cause us to inspect it minutely. We turn it over and over in our minds, searching for meaning: a lesson, a parable, or a moral mnemonic.

The result is almost always a banal lie we tell ourselves individually and collectively. It is cheap and convenient. Whether to salve pain, gain absolution, or conveniently sop tears of shame and frustration, that lie is above all human, but the price is that we are left casting about for a reason why.

The banal lie in Brad Morgan’s death is a socially acceptable euphemism for manslaughter commonly known as “suicide by cop.” It is the same lie police spokesmen have used to describe the deaths of Aaron Campbell, Keaton Otis, Jack Collins, Darryel Ferguson, Anthony McDowell, Jimmy Georgeson, Elias Angel Ruiz, Larry McKinney, and many others. In each of these cases, a suicidal man was killed by someone other than himself. When a life is cut short by another person, it is wrong to call it suicide — especially when the man behind the trigger is a police officer.

Just 21 years old and a new father, Brad Morgan climbed an elevator tower at a downtown parking garage and used his cell phone to tell the 9-1-1 operator that he planned to kill himself.

Long before that moment, it had gone too far. Brad Morgan’s fate was sealed when he did exactly what we are all taught to do from childhood.

Every social service agency, mental health provider, church therapist, doctor’s office, and hundreds of others who provide help in crises have similar after-hours greetings. We have all heard the familiar final words without paying too much attention: “If this is a life-threatening emergency, please hang up and dial 9-1-1.”

He may or may not have heard those words, but he did exactly as they instructed.

Brad Morgan now had two problems: Not only did he want to die, but police were on their way.

When 9-1-1 is the default overnight number for hundreds of agencies that promote their ability to help in a crisis, we have effectively criminalized mental illness. We force police, at best lightly trained in mental health issues, to be all-night, ad hoc therapists — a proven poor match.

When cops learn by trial and error, our friends die.

It is not a crime to be mentally ill. It is not a crime to be drunk or high. And it is not a crime to attempt or commit suicide.

It is, however, a crime to assist a suicide. To intentionally cause or aid another person to kill himself is second-degree manslaughter.

In a more just society, the officer who fired the fatal shot would be facing six years, three months in prison.

The 9-1-1 transcript reveals that Brad Morgan told the dispatcher, “I’d actually prefer for a police officer to shoot me at this point. I am not looking forward to this jump.”

To face criminal charges as a result of assisting a suicide is rare. A prudent person would never help. Imagine a distraught man in a hardware store, tears streaming down his face, clothing torn, in obvious anguish, demanding of the bewildered shopkeeper, “Show me how to tie a noose!”

Brad Morgan told a 9-1-1 operator that he wanted a cop to shoot him. That operator passed the call to the police, along with the details of Morgan’s desire to be shot by them. Informed by this banal lie we have all unthinkingly agreed to call “suicide by cop,” and expecting that they would be tasked with ending Morgan’s life, police hurried to arrive at the scene of a foregone conclusion. As always, they were ill-trained to handle a mental health situation.

How is it that our hypothetical shopkeeper is able to refuse to give instruction in tying a noose, but our police bureau is unable to field officers capable of refraining from shooting a man who is actively seeking to be shot? Why didn’t the Morgan grand jury bring a charge against the officers involved?

Astonishingly, they could not. The wrong training is provided to our police, and the wrong charge was put before the grand jury.

The proper training would have taught our police not to facilitate “suicide by cop,” and the proper charge would have been assisting a suicide.

Desiring, attempting, or completing suicide is a lonely, broken expression of intolerable pain. It is not a criminal enterprise, but a public health matter. To effectively make suicidal thoughts criminal, simply because we have no mental health safety net, is inexcusable.

We failed Brad Morgan, and in doing so, failed ourselves.

James Mazzocco is on the Advisory Council of the Mental Health Association of Portland.

3 Responses to “‘Suicide by cop’ means manslaughter”

  1. seymour Says:

    Some how I missed this excellent article. Thank you for asking us the questions we all should be asking ourselves. Every human services agency, doctors office and countless others has this message. “If this an emergency call 911.” It has always seemed for liability issues more than helpful assistance. It is so sad that the crisis center cannot be accessed directly. A individual in crisis should be able to walk in and ask or even ask the to be taken there.Millions of dollars flushed down the toliet.
    .

  2. randy morgan Says:

    BRAD LEE MORGAN YOU ARE VERY LOVED BY MANY.

  3. randy morgan Says:

    BRAD WAS NOT A KILLER, HE DID NOT DESERVE TO BE SHOT, ITS NEVER TO LATE FOR A BEAN BAG SGT,HOLBROOK. YOU NEED A FIREARM CAM, SO YOU CAN TELL THE TRUTH. IF THE GUN BRAD DID NOT HAVE, COULD GROW IT WOULD TELL THE TRUTH, IT IS A PLANT, YOU KNOW,THE REAL THING IS AT HOME, BRAD HAD ACCESS TO ANYTIME IT WAS NEEDED ,IN A SAFE TO STAY SAFE., BRAD WONTED VISITATION WITH HIS SON, HE NEEDED HELP, I WAS NOT ABLE TO GIVE HIM THE HELP HE NEEDED. BRAD HAD HIS PAPER WORK WITH HIM, WHEN HE WAS SHOT. NOT A TOY GUN AND PANT HE BOUGHT ONE MINUIT LATER ACROSS LOMBARD AT 4:00 p.m. AT AUTO ZONE ? WITHOUT SHOWING I.D., AGAINST, THE PORTLAND CHAPTER 14 LAW MUST SHOW I.D. ,UNLESS POLICE NEED PAINT, APARENTLY. I AM BRADS DAD, I HAVE MUCH MORE TO SAY, BUT FOR NOW GUN CAMS IS MY MESSAGE, PASS IT ON THANK .YOU

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>